October 24, 2013
This is the second review to be completed by one of my current final year dissertation students. Many thanks to Stephanie Donoghue for reviewing this recent article on homophobia.
Poteat, V. P., DiGiovanni, C. D., Scheer, J. R. (2012). Predicting homophobic behavior among heterosexual youth: Domain generaland sexual orientation-speciﬁc factors at the individual and contextual level. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 351–362.
This study examined possible predictors of students’ engaging in verbal use of homophobic behaviour. Individual measures of empathy, perspective taking and classroom respect were three domain general factors looked at in the belief that individuals scoring low on these would be more likely to engage in homophobic behaviour. Importance of identity, number of sexual minority friends, parents’ sexual minority attitudes and messages in the media were all examined under sexual orientation specific factors as influenced by the broader social context. In the present research, prejudice and bullying were also assessed to examine whether their presence had a strengthening effect or reduced the relationship between domain general factors and sexual orientation specific factors in predicting homophobic behaviour.
These authors recruited 618 high school students, 9th to 12th grade (around 14-17 years old) to take part in the study. Students were required to complete survey questions relating to both general and specific factors and homophobic behaviour over the preceding 30 days.
Multiple domain general factors:
Lower scores on empathy were seen to be associated more strongly with prejudiced behaviour and lower scores on perspective taking was associated more so with bullying. However both of these factors had significant indirect effects in predicting students’ engaging in homophobic behaviour. Such findings support the cognitive nature of bullying: specifically, that lack of empathy and perspective taking can result in higher levels of bullying, prejudice and homophobic behaviour.
Sexual orientation specific factors:
Sexual orientation identity predicted stronger sexual prejudice and homophobic behaviour. This supports social identity theory whereby in-group members engage in behaviour that differentiates themselves from the out-group minority to consolidate their belonging to the sexual majority. Being friends with young people from sexual minorities was not associated with homophobic behaviour but did predict lower levels of prejudice, thus supporting the theory that being in contact with minority groups may lower intolerance. Finally, results indicated that parents’ attitudes toward members of sexual minorities had an effect on whether young people engaged in homophobic behaviour. However, contrary to the belief that positive media portrayals change behaviour, images in the media did not (in a roundabout way) predict homophobic behaviour.
These results suggest that it is important not to isolate one reason in examining causes behind homophobic behaviour. Instead, this study examined multiple factors in combination. Results suggest that although homophobic behaviour has been shown to be a manifestation of both prejudice and bullying, there are other fundamental factors converging to predict involvement in this type of behaviour.
Interestingly, these results indicated that media images did not predict homophobic behaviour in students. This may shed light on the important role that peers and parents play in engaging with homophobic behaviour. On the other hand, the measure used here could be viewed as being problematic because the role of media was examined using only one question. More of a thorough analysis might have been achieved if the researchers had developed more detailed questions.
The current research points towards ways of combating or countering the use of homophobic language used as banter in the school environment by suggesting that more can be done by both teachers in the classroom and parents at home to open up and speak more about respect towards members of sexual minorities.
October 21, 2013
This post is by one of my current final year dissertation students, Gillian Scanlan. Thanks to Gillian for summarising this paper, she did a great job.
Kopala-Sibley, D. C., Zuroff, D. C., Leybman, M. J., & Hope, N. (2013). Recalled peer relationship experiences and current levels of self-criticism and self-reassurance. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 86, 33-51.
This study set out to identify if recalled levels of parental support, peer support and peer victimization were related to college students’ levels of self-criticism and self-reassurance in their present life. The researchers were specifically interested in whether the effects upon young adults of being bullied from the ages of 10-14 were different according to their levels of recalled social support from both parents and peers.
This study involved 200 college students aged 18 to 25 years old. Participants were given a series of questionnaires that measured current levels of self-criticism as well as recalled relationships with parents and peers. The recalled relationship with parents and peers were to be reported specifically when the participants were between the ages of 10-14.
Victimization and Prosocial Behaviour: Men recalled experiencing higher levels of physical victimization, e.g. being hit or punched by another peer, than women did. Women reported that their peers showed more acts of kindness and concern for them when they were bullied.
Parental support: Increased level of support from both parents was found to be associated with lower levels of self-hating and reduced feelings of unworthiness. Increased support from parents also increased confidence and self-assurance of a victim. Those who recalled higher current levels of maternal care or higher levels of kindness and concern reported higher levels of self-assurance.
Roles of peer relationships: Those who recalled more physical victimization (regardless of gender) reported higher levels of self-criticism, self-hate and lower levels of self-assurance. People who recalled experiencing more kindness and concern from peers during a bullying incident in childhood reported lower levels of self-hatred and higher levels of self-reassurance in their current life.
These results are interesting as it appears that the increased social support a person receives in both their home environment and their peer environment helps to create feelings of positivity and self-assurance, thus allowing a confident young adult to emerge. The results furthermore show that low social support from both parents when being victimized can have long term psychological effects upon a person’s emotional well-being when they get into adulthood.
Overall, this study highlights the importance of good peer relationships and parental care. It would appear from the findings that having kind and supportive peers and parents from childhood plays an integral role in helping to reduce the stress of negative social events.